Implement same domain model in Python and C# - What should be the same and what should vary? -


i am, hobby , best-practice exercise, implement same domain model (a simple gps / gis library, inspired in iso 191xx stardards , ogc abstract model) both in python , c#.

it first, tought: "well, iso/ogc gave me finished uml, have each class in c# , in python have same signature".

i found myself stuck in "strict/static vs duck typing" problem, since cannot count on method signatures in python. example:

  • overloading constructors quite common , natural in c#, in python have resort *args **kwargs , conditionals;
  • properties encouraged in c#, source code have seen around in python tend set fields directly, although use of @property or property() quite straightforward.
  • (and on).

actually there (obviously) obvious , documented "difference in mindsets" between 1 language , other, , respect differences while @ same time ending "the same" application, is, equivalent domain model, architecture , functionality.

so question is:

if implement same abstract model ("uml-like") in python , c#, how should proceed, , specifically, constructs should invariant, , should different?

what called "abstract model" in mda called platform independent model (pim), , implementation in c# and/or python called platform specific model (psm). supposed there exist tranformations/code-generators pim psm's, depending on how these code-generations work appropriate c# , python source code. usually, such tools provide means control code generated. , such control done via pim annotations specific psm generating. hope helps.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - RequestAnimationFrame not working when exiting fullscreen switching space on Safari -

jsf - How to ajax update an item in the footer of a PrimeFaces dataTable? -

jquery - Keeping Kendo Datepicker in min/max range -